Which is why, even as the Ukrainians scream, beg and politic for more munitions, they’ve shot down as many as six Russian fighter-bombers in just the last three days. A rate of loss the Russian air force cannot sustai
“Russian planes continue to fall!” the Ukrainian defense ministry crowed on Monday. The claimed tally includes four twin-seat Sukhoi Su-34 fighter-bombers and two single-seat Sukhoi Su-35s.
The Su-34s are the Russian air force’s best supersonic strike planes. Lately they mostly have flown close-air-support missions—streaking high and fast toward the front line and lobbing KAB precision glide-bombs from as far away as 25 miles.
The supersonic Su-35s are air-superiority fighters: they escort the Su-34s.
The Ukrainians bagged the first three Sukhois on Saturday as the jets were flying 60 miles east of Avdiivka in eastern Ukraine, apparently lining up for a glide-bombing raid on the Ukrainian troops retreating from that ruined city.
The Ukrainian military claimed it shot down a fourth Sukhoi on Sunday and two more on Monday, the latter over the Sea of Azov in the south.
It’s possible, likely even, that Ukraine’s Patriot PAC-2 missile-batteries—three of which Ukraine has received from the United States and Germany—were responsible for all six shoot-downs.
The Ukrainian air force has deployed one Patriot battery in Kyiv and one each in the south and east. A battery’s truck-mounted launchers can spread out and move while still linking to the battery’s radars.
The Russian air force isn’t about to run out of Sukhois. In two years of hard fighting, according to Oryx, the Russians have lost 25 of their 150 Su-34s and six of their 120 Su-35s.
But the recent rate of loss—six jets in three days—is unsustainable if it continues. The Russian air force has lost 95 jets since February 2022. That’s four per month. In the last week, however, the air force has written off warplanes at a rate of 60 per month.
For an air force that has just a thousand fast jets, losing 60 in a month would be catastrophic. The loss of experienced aircrews might sting even more, according to a recent report from the Royal United Services Institute in London.
Leave a Reply