Graham Annesley has backed a couple of controversial Bunker calls out of Saturday night’s game in Newcastle that will only add to the frustration of Parramatta fans who feel their side was denied two tries by the Bunker.
The Eels ultimately went down 34-26 to the Knights, with wingers Maika Sivo and Blaize Talagi denied tries that could have easily changed the outcome of the contest.
These were only a few of the decisions made on a contentious evening in the Hunter, but Annesley has defended the officials, saying they had the right to give the hosts a try even though the referee had stopped Clint Gutherson from making a tackle.
In the second half, Talagi appeared to have scored his third try, but the referee ruled that he had grounded the ball short and then slid it forward, resulting in a knock-on. It was the closest call of the game.
Parramatta Eels winger Blaize Talagi has been denied what looked to be a certain try…
Could those four points have changed the outcome of the clash? 🤔https://t.co/nxEw4S6F29
— Fox League (@FOXNRL) June 29, 2024
“This is quite different to the interpretation we spoke about at the start of the year where if a ball comes out of a hand as the player is trying to place it on the ground, if there is separation then they have to catch up with it before it hits the ground, and then if it does roll down the arm and they catch up with it, that can be ruled a try,” Annesley explained.
“But that’s not what happens here because the ball was firstly grounded short of the line, and regardless of what you think about the separation, it’s short of the line and then the ball rolls across the line with the arm.
“If you elevate that up off the ground then the ball comes out of his hand and there’s nothing to stop it from dropping away from the air.
“There’s no way this can be ruled a try. It was ruled no try live, and there was no evidence for the Bunker to overturn the original decision.”
Sivo had earlier had a try of his own disallowed by the referee who said the ball never came in contact with the try line as he fought through defenders and then got the ball to the grass.
The Bunker decided to support the live decision, and Annesley concedes it was so tight that the video review officials would have awarded a try if that’s what the on-field referee had said.
“These things are literally matters of millimetres, but close enough is not good enough,” Annesley said.
“This was ruled no try on the field so the Bunker has to be able to prove conclusively that this was a try.
“There is initially a hand that goes under the ball. There’s no doubt the ball does get to the ground, but it gets to the ground as it starts to get pushed back.
“The Bunker had no conclusive evidence with which to overrule the on-field decision, so again I can’t fault the process in that regard.
“Some people might claim that they see the ball touch the line, but I can’t conclusively say that so it’s one of those decisions where we ultimately have to go with the decision made by the referee on the field.”
Leave a Reply